Why does a President need a national civilian security force that is just as well equipped, funded and trained as our combined Military? Where the hell is all this money going to come from?

Like Glenn, I want to know why we need such a thing? Who, or what, is Barack Obama so scared of that he would undertake building such an army?

Here are some of my thoughts on the whole deal.

First off, such a force would be able to work against the Citizens. Currently, the military is prohibited by the Constitution from taking action against U.S. Citizens on U.S. soil. So a National Civilian Security Force would be just the ticket to get around that.

Such a Force would likely be loyal only to the President instead of the Country or its citizens. Just like Sadam’s Fedayeen Soldiers were only loyal to him or Hitler’s SS Troops who were loyal to him instead of the Country. Scary. Also, such a force could be used to keep tabs on our Military and intervene should they try and take action against another “force” on U.S. soil.

I’m unaware of any Country that is a free Republic that has a Leader with it’s own security forces. We usually think of those little turds of the third world countries when we think of this.

Furthermore, such a force could be directed to do the grunt work of the President, directed to do things he didn’t want to dirty his hands with, like disbanding protest, confiscating firearms from Citizens, invoking Marshal Law, taking over Radio and TV stations, spying on civilians and a lot of other stuff.

I’m wanting to believe none of this will happen and that the thought of Obama creating a National Civilian Defense Force is just a pipe dream for him. But I’m beginning to see the writing on the wall and I don’t like what I’m reading.

Funny, it’s usually the Democrats who are whining that we spend too much money on National Defense and the Military, now we have a Democratic President who wants to spend the dough to raise a Civilian Army. Not only that, but he wants to equip and train them to be just as powerful as the U.S. Military.

It’s all about the Ice Cream

The most eye-opening civics lesson I ever had was while teaching third grade. The presidential election was heating up and some of the children showed an interest. I decided we would have an election for a class president. We would choose our nominees. They would make a campaign speech and the class would vote.

To simplify the process, candidates were nominated by other class members. We discussed what kinds of characteristics these students should have. We got many nominations and from those, Jamie and Olivia were picked to run for the top spot.

The class had done a great job in their selections. Both candidates were good kids. I thought Jamie might have an advantage because he got lots of parental support. I had never seen Olivia’s mother.

The day arrived when they were to make their speeches Jamie went first. He had specific ideas about how to make our class a better place. He ended by promising to do his very best. Every one applauded.

He sat down and Olivia came to the podium. Her speech was concise. She said, “If you will vote for me, I will give you ice cream.” She sat down. The class went wild. “Yes! Yes! We want ice cream.”

She surely would say more. She did not have to. A discussion followed. How did she plan to pay for the ice cream? She wasn’t sure. Would her parents buy it or would the class pay for it. She didn’t know.

The class really didn’t care. All they were thinking about was ice cream. Jamie was forgotten. Olivia won by a land slide.

Every time Barack Obama opens his mouth he offers ice cream, and fifty percent of America reacts like nine year olds. They want ice cream. The other fifty percent know they’re going to have to feed the cow.

Yep, I think many of us will be milking a lot of Cows over the next 4 years paying for all that free ice cream. He wasn’t joking when he said he was going to spread the wealth around. What’s going to be funny is when he starts spreading the wealth of those who voted for him around!

Joe The Plumber Actually Gets It

I read this interview on Family Security Matters with Joe. He’s you’re average guy in America. He works toward the American dream. And what’s so special about him is that he actually knows what the American Dream is, unlike so many Obama supporters.

He also sees past the crap that Obama dishes out. Again, unlike many Americans.

Main Stream Media Jumps on Joe The Plumber

Now it seems that the main stream media has a new target and his name is Joe The Plumber. How dare an Average Joe (no pun intended) question the Obamesiah about his plans for America, thus exposing his Socialist plans for America. The same plans the main stream media has worked so hard to keep the lid on.

Now they’ve dug up that Joe owes some back taxes. Is it any wonder why he’s worried about Obama’s tax increase? There are many small businesses who owe back taxes, myself being one of them. You make payments and pay them as you can. Simple as that.

The fact that Joe The Plumber owes back taxes actually gives his plight more creditbility.

The bashing doesn’t stop with the media either. Everyone from Obama hisself down to the late night talk show host have pounced on Joe. Obama’s remarks at a rally was “How many plumbers do you know who make $250,000?” Ummm, actually Obama, I know many small business owners with just a few employees that gross over $250,000. This is why Obama’s Socialist plan is so scary.

As for the late night talk show host like Letterman and Leno, well it’s no secret that they’re Liberals with an audience. They’ve never tried to hide it so I guess it was expected for them to show their true colors.

I’m betting that more of Obama’s Socialist views are uncovered between now and election time. I’m also betting his handlers will keep Joe the Plumber’s from asking him anymore simple questions!

On a lighter note, has anyone seen President Obama and the Filipino Clone? The resemblence is scary! It makes you wonder if some secret agency has been cloning humans for a long time. That would explain a lot about Obama’s past!

Today, Sarah Palin was critisized when she mentioned Obama’s ties to a known terrorist and money man, William Ayers. She actually got part of her story from the New York Times article about the connection between Obama and Ayers.

As you can imagine, the Obama campaign is sidestepping this issue and trying to accuse the McCain campaign as initiating a smear tactic. Which is pretty normal when a politician doesn’t want to talk about something that is probably true.

Another thing that has been nagging me for quite sometime is Obama’s fierce denial of making public some of his thesis work at Columbia and Harvard. In fact, he has went as far as flat out prohibiting either University from releasing his thesis work. He also will not release other documents from his college years.

Hmmm…why?

Is it because there would be something in those papers that Americans wouldn’t like? Probably so if you follow Obama’s radical past.

FOX airs Hannity’s America tonight. Sean goes into great detail putting the whole puzzle about Obama’s shady past into focus. Love him or hate him, Hannity did an excellent job organizing facts that the Obama Campaign would rather not have Americans know about. Below are the 6 sets of YouTube video’s. Watch them if you haven’t seen Hannity’s America. If you haven’t, I think it’ll open up your eyes to who this man they call Barack Hussein Obama really is.

Part One

[youtube:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_HZMD97nMw]

Part Two

[youtube:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h1TAnDcQyjA]

Part Three

[youtube:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7y3U383Ffuk]

Part Four

[youtube:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7g__--BJ9I]

Part Five

[youtube:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxCZzxEfUAs]

Part Six

[youtube:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxfQD4If7kk]

As you can see, if you watched all the video’s, Barack Hussein Obama has some explaining to do to the American public. But does the American public really care? Or do they only care about what one party or the other promises them?

It’s funny. I’ve talked to several people who have told me that they wouldn’t be surprised if Obama was a muslim extremist sleeper. After watching this set of video’s, I wouldn’t be surprised either.

I have a hard time with this one, especially if it is true.

Dear Friends,

The following is an article from the July 7, 2008, issue #27 from “The American Free Press” Newspaper, an article by Assistant editor, Pat Shannon.

“It now appears that Barack Obama is consitutionally ineligible for the office of president. John McCain’s eligibility was established in 1964, when courts ruled Sen. Barry Goldwater was eligible although he was born in Arizona when it was a territory, not a state. McCain was born in the Panama Canal Zone when it was a U.S.territory.

And, even as the controlled media continues to ignore the ineligibility of Obama, it wil l not go away. While few doubt that the Democrats will manage to pull off his nomination, all remain poised to view the legal performance.

The first hurdle will be having Obama produce his birth certificate, which so far he has refused to do, and prove that he was born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961, as he has always claimed. There is speculation that his American mother may have brought him to Honolulushortly after his birth in Kenya, but no proof of that has been shown.

According to the law on the books at the time of Obama’s birth, the office of president requires that a candidate be a natural citizen if the child was not born to two U.S.citizen parents. Since he was not,sho uld it be proven th at Obama was not born in Hawaii, as claimed, he is ineligible without further debate. But assuring that he was born there, he has another problem.

According to a legal researcher who has contacted the AFP, U.S.law very clearly states: “If only one parent is a U.S.citizen at the time of one’s birth, that parent must have resided in the United Statesfor a minimum of 10 years, five of which must be after the age of 16.” And therein lies Obama’s new problem.

Barack Obama’s father was never a U.S.citizen.

Interestingly, there isn’t much paperwork on the marriage of Obama’s parents, and this has a few researchers speculating that it never took place at all. On page 27 of “Obama: From Promise to Power”, David Mendell writes: “Obama later confessed that he never searched for the government documents on the marriage, although Madelyn (Obama’s maternal grandmother) insisted they were legally married.” He also notes that Obama’s father apparently was not legally divorced from his first wife back in Kenyaat the time, a point of contention that ultimately led to their separation. This also would suggest that there may never have been any legal marriage by Obama’s parents at all, but the Constitution does not ban an illegitimate child from the White House, as long as he was born inside the U.S.

Obama’s mother was born in Kansas and was only 18 when Obama was born. This means even though she satisfied the citizen requirement for 10 years, she was not a citizen for at least five years prior to Obama’s birth. In essence, the mother alone is not old enough to qualify her som for automatic U.S.citizenship. At most, two years elapsed from his mother turning 16 to the time of Barack Obama’s birth when she was 18. His mother would have needed to have been 16 + 5 = 21 years old at the time of Barack Obama’s birth for him to be a natural-born citizen. Barack Obama was already three years old at the time his mother turned 21.

Technically, Obama should have been naturalized as a citizen, but that, of course, would disqualify him from holding the office of president.&nbs p; If the allegations are accurate, America could install in January of 2009 a new president who is not even a U.S.citizen, neither born nor naturalized.

It should be demanded that Obama produce his 1961 Hawaiian birth certificate.

If Barrack Obama cannot satisfactorily do so, he should be deemed immediately ineligible to hold the office of president.”